Keyword extractor

Search Engine Strategies Logo
Image via Wikipedia

Have you ever wondered why some websites end up higher on search engine results than others? Now there’s a new tool to add to your search engine analysis – AnalogX Keyword Extractor!
AnalogX Keyword Extractor (KeyEx) extracts all of the keywords off of a webpage, and then sorts and indexes them based off of their usage and position. Once indexed, you can adjust search-engine specific weighting factors and keyword criteria to get the best possible view of how a search engine sees your site. KeyEx can load up both local files as well as files off other websites, and even can work through a proxy, and can have separate configurations for as many search engines as you’d like to enter!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Free image hosting sites

You can use these sites to find appropriate photos for your blogs or Squidoo. You can also upload photos to them as a way of storing them off your computer or sharing them with friends.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wikipedia search engine

wikipediatrans.gifDespite knowing that many contributions to wikipedia are dubious, depending on the politics of the contributer, and also knowing that the FBI and CIA monitor it fairly closely, here is a new wikipedia search engine.

Wikipedia, if accurate, would surely be the most searchable database, but it still does not have that reputation. On topics that I know about, it is not so much what is said as what is not said. I’d be telling my students, that as it is a database that anyone can contribute to and edit, that they need to check its authority as a reference.

Nevertheless, it is an excellent start for many students.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Blogs or web sites

You know when I started designing web sites, blogs didn’t exist. My first web site was made with Microsoft Publisher and a little bit of HTML knowledge. Pretty well every webmy dog site then took an age to download, even if I had had cable then, and had heaps of large graphics and lots of animated graphics. Text was big and the design was usually pretty poor.

By the time I bought dreamweaver, in preference to Front Page, thank God, I was ready to get my own domain name and host. Dreamweaver was pretty easy to learn and I thought, great, this is the best thing since sliced bread.

Then there were all those books in computer book stores about Java and PHP and I didn’t have a clue. But I did learn how to use javascripts not as a developer of them, but as a web designer.

Now we were suddenly going up to XHTML and CSS had arrived. It was all going too fast for me. I’ve managed both of those now, sort of, but we are almost back to a full circle with build a page, wikis, blogs, swickis all of which means that no-one has to know any code.

There’s debate all the time about which way the internet is going to go next. Was it going to be a content management system or was it going to be a blog?

I’ve used both and even had a forum at one time too. But it is only now that I have added WordPress to my site. And I like it.

With my web site, I tried DHTML menus so that every time I added a page I could update the menu in a flash. I’ve learnt Paint Shop pro, but not everything about Photoshop. I’ve made video tutorials that go to YouTube and I’ve made some podcasts. I love technology.

I could never afford much, so any spare cash went on the computer and we now have 2 networked. I’ve never done any IT study.

I find it almost impossible to keep up with all the changes, so the blog makes it easier to write a page and have it indexed almost immediately. Word Press has so many plugins to make it like a web site. There are not just posts here.

Should I change my whole site over to this blog or have it as a quick update of news to do with web design? Maybe not. I’d lose whatever ranking I have.

But which will do better? I have added google analytics to this blog so I can see my visitors. This blog is still only a month old so I don’t expect too many click throughs yet. I have a number of subscribers to my feed already though.

That’s another thing about blogs. A person can see all your posts in one click in their reader of RSS feeds. Subscriptions to web sites like I have seem to be slowing down. RSS is so much easier, although I may add an email subscription to my feed also.

I think too that most of the interesting stuff is appearing more on blogs than web sites. Of course the corporations and small businesses need their web sites. They don’t need to be changed that much, but whenever you go to google adsense or google analytics for example, do they care much about design? I don’t think so. They don’t need to.

Some blogs and web sites are really beautiful and I still like a good looking site.

Anyway, what do you think? What will be the future of the internet and please don’t say mobile phones.

Oh? About the eyes on the dog. I’ll get rid of the blue pupils for the next post and tell you how I did that as if you didn’t know!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Xara extreme pro tutorial

http://www.xaraxone.com/tutorials/aug07/index.html

I advertise Xara graphics because they are very versatile.

You could make this.

wildflower

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Over 5000 web 2.0 applications

Dew on a spider's web in the morning.
Image via Wikipedia

This site has many free sites where you can communicate, share, and edit stuff online. They are all web 2.0 applications. Worth a good look. I tried out resize an image and that was good. Easier than going into Irfan View I suppose.

http://simplespark.com/

Enhanced by Zemanta

Widgets

Adding Desktop Gadgets
Image via Wikipedia

http://www.widgipedia.com/

Here’s an interesting site if you want to make widgets for your web page or desktop.

You can also use the widgets that are there. There is a URL to each one and the embed instructions as well.

There’s a forum on this site as well.

Here’s another site which just offers you gadgets to add to your site.

http://www.smartwebgadgets.com/

Enhanced by Zemanta